by "Woody Rao" <nvwoody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 6, 2005 at 08:57 AM
stefan
thanks for writing back!. there definitely are rows there.
so it's got to be some other setting on those PC's
while other pc's are ok.
woody
"Stefan Rybacki" <stefan.rybacki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:3j060rFmlhs1U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Woody Rao wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me why some PC's return the actual number of rows that
>> are affected by the last SQL statement and other PC's return 0? This
is
>> SQL Server 2000.
>>
>> TIA
>> Woody
> Maybe in a query with affected rows 0 no rows have been affected?
>
> Regards
> Stefan
