Re: SQLNRows

Woody Rao wrote:
> stefan
> 
> thanks for writing back!.  there definitely are rows there.
> so it's got to be some other setting on those PC's
> while other pc's are ok.
> woody
> 
> "Stefan Rybacki" <stefan.rybacki@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:3j060rFmlhs1U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>Woody Rao wrote:
>>
>>>Can anyone tell me why some PC's return the actual number of rows that 
>>>are affected by the last SQL statement and other PC's return 0?  This
is 
>>>SQL Server 2000.
>>>
>>>TIA
>>>Woody
>>
>>Maybe in a query with affected rows 0 no rows have been affected?
>>
>>Regards
>>Stefan 
> 
> 
> 
What about presenting some queries and results where the "error" occured?

Regards
Stefan