"CNerd2025" <andrew.elgert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1125088193.426199.268230@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cl***** are inherently abstract, but
| the actual objects are not. You can modify the source to change some of
| the specifics, but it is harder to modify the specifics from the front
| end.
oop is inherently abstract...cl***** are specific. you goal should be to
build the foundation as abstractly as possible. and each layer to which
you
add on top of that foundation are more specific to the final functionality
you want to provide. that is not only how oop works but most other forms
of
programming save, perhaps, ladder logic.
you can even specifically program, in oop, such that your final
functionality *is* defined abstraction...where your top most (or deepest
nested) objects have a uniform interface but one setting difference could
make it seem to be an entirely different animal than another instance of
the
same object.
unless you are paying a great deal of money to your developers, i don't
have
the time nor inclination to build such a system...esp. when there are
several others already saturating a saturated market...i see no roi to be
had here - even for you.
|
