Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Filemaker > Re: ****tal rel...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 6 Topic 8014 of 8265
Post > Topic >>

Re: ****tal relation****p

by Grip <grip@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 28, 2008 at 06:41 PM

On Apr 28, 6:56 pm, David <davidandh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hi.  I have three tables: managers, contacts and phone numbers.  Each
> manager can have multiple contacts, and each contact can have multiple
> phone numbers.  On the manager layout, I created a ****tal to list the
> phone numbers for all related contacts.  This works fine until I
> realized that any contacts *without* phone numbers won't appear in the
> ****tal at all.  This is a problem since I use the ****tal and GTRR to
> navigate from manager to related contacts (whether or not they have a
> phone number).
>
> As a possible solution, I made a script that creates a 'blank' phone
> number everytime a new contact is created.  The 'blank' phone number
> lists the contact name and dutifully appears in the manager's ****tal.
> The trouble is I can't think of a clever calculation/relation****p that
> can distinguish when to use the 'blank' phone number (ie, for a
> contact without phone numbers) and when to ignore the blank (ie, when
> a contact has one or more real phone numbers).  This became especially
> tricky with multiple contacts, phone numbers, etc...
>
> Any suggestions?  I also tried making a "Show All Contacts" button,
> but that seems inelegant and doesn't really solve the problem.
> Thanks!
>
> FM Advanced 8.5 on Mac OS 10.5.2

You don't really use the ****tal to GTRR to related contacts.  You use
a relation****p upon which the ****tal is also based.  Instead of
creating a bunch of fake records, create another relation****p
instead.  One that includes all contacts, whether they have a phone
number or not, then GTRR on that relation****p.
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Portal relationship
David <davidandhope@[E  2008-04-28 17:56:31 
Re: Portal relationship
Grip <grip@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-28 18:41:08 
Re: Portal relationship
Helpful Harry <helpful  2008-04-29 16:06:08 
Re: Portal relationship
David <davidandhope@[E  2008-04-29 18:03:23 
Re: Portal relationship
Howard Schlossberg <ho  2008-04-29 18:52:06 
Re: Portal relationship
Helpful Harry <helpful  2008-04-30 17:10:23 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Sep 8 2:37:19 CDT 2008.