Talk About Network

Google





Data Bases > IBM DB2 > Re: UDF ****tab...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 12 Topic 9074 of 9564
Post > Topic >>

Re: UDF ****tability?

by Udo <udo.weigl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 10, 2008 at 07:06 AM

> I can execute it. The bad news is that it produces garbage for
> output.
>

Hi Evan,

each time I saw an udf producing such a rubbish, the reason was a
wrong parameter list in the "create procedure" statement.
Unfortunately nobody protects your shared library from misinterpreting
the parameter list.

Regards,
Udo

--
Speedgain for DB2 - The DB2 Monitor
http://www.itgain.de/en/produkte/speedgain.html
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
UDF Portability?
esmith2112 <esmith2112  2008-07-10 05:20:49 
Re: UDF Portability?
Serge Rielau <srielau@  2008-07-10 09:19:39 
Re: UDF Portability?
Udo <udo.weigl@[EMAIL   2008-07-10 07:06:22 
Re: UDF Portability?
esmith2112 <esmith2112  2008-07-10 07:28:43 
Re: UDF Portability?
esmith2112 <esmith2112  2008-07-10 08:31:26 
Re: UDF Portability?
Serge Rielau <srielau@  2008-07-10 13:16:14 
Re: UDF Portability?
"Dave Hughes" &  2008-07-12 15:57:39 
Re: UDF Portability?
Knut Stolze <stolze@[E  2008-07-11 12:41:54 
Re: UDF Portability?
esmith2112 <esmith2112  2008-07-11 05:34:23 
Re: UDF Portability?
Knut Stolze <stolze@[E  2008-07-16 19:32:28 
Re: UDF Portability?
esmith2112 <esmith2112  2008-07-14 13:30:02 
Re: UDF Portability?
esmith2112 <esmith2112  2008-07-15 13:45:56 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 22:10:10 PST 2009.