------=_Part_9885_24320584.1209700600824
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Microsoft duplicating something is news since when ?? They have 15
different
options for scaling and availability all of which so far don't do either.
So
adopting another technology that has a similar pattern shouldn't be news.
They seem to have some sort of platform limitation too, hmm, can't seem to
remember what ..
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:24 PM, DA Morgan <damorgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> InDeep wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you're talking about. I love RAC. Oracle has
> > created more overtime for me, more billable hours than I could
> > ever imagine. It is a gold mine, or even better, an oil well.
>
> And now IBM, apparently since we've not seen the specifics or a
> production implementation, wants to do the same. <g> And I know
> for a fact Microsoft is working on duplicating it too. Funny
> how just a few years ago these very same folks were criticizing
> RAC and saying it was unnecessary. Hmmmm.
>
> While Serge and others worry about their cor****ate masters ...
> my interest is squarely in continuing employment for myself
> and my students.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Wa****ngton
> damorgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(replace x with u to respond)
> _______________________________________________
> Informix-list mailing list
> Informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
>
------=_Part_9885_24320584.1209700600824
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Microsoft duplicating something is news since when ?? They have 15
different options for scaling and availability all of which so far
don't do either. So adopting another technology that has a similar
pattern shouldn't be news. They seem to have some sort of platform
limitation too, hmm, can't seem to remember what ..<br><br><div
class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:24 PM, DA Morgan <<a
href="mailto:damorgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">damorgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">InDeep wrote:<br>
> I'm not sure what you're talking about. I love RAC.
Oracle has<br>
> created more overtime for me, more billable hours than I could<br>
> ever imagine. It is a gold mine, or even better, an oil
well.<br>
<br>
</div>And now IBM, apparently since we've not seen the specifics or
a<br>
production implementation, wants to do the same. <g> And I know<br>
for a fact Microsoft is working on duplicating it too. Funny<br>
how just a few years ago these very same folks were criticizing<br>
RAC and saying it was unnecessary. Hmmmm.<br>
<br>
While Serge and others worry about their cor****ate masters ...<br>
my interest is squarely in continuing employment for myself<br>
and my students.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">--<br>
Daniel A. Morgan<br>
University of Wa****ngton<br>
<a href="mailto:damorgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">damorgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
(replace x with u to respond)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">Informix-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">Informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
><br>
<a href="http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list"
target="_blank">http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_9885_24320584.1209700600824--
|
