Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Informix > Re: reliability...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 12 Topic 13976 of 15119
Post > Topic >>

Re: reliability?

by "Bingjie Miao" <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 04:42 PM

This problem exists on the following versions:

9.40:   9.40.xC8W2 through 9.40.xC8W7, 9.40.xC9, should be fixed by 
9.40.xC9W1 and above.
10.00: 10.00.xC5, 10.00.xC6, should be fixed by 10.00.xC6W1 and above 
including 10.00.xC7 and 10.00.xC8.

It does not exist in 11.10 and above.

Bingjie Miao


"Kevin Cherkauer" <invalid_address@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fvt7jp$adn$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bingjie Miao on the optimizer team tells me this bug was indeed fixed 
> already. He already sent a reply posting via a moderated feed, so it 
> should arrive here eventually. :-)
>
> -- 
> Kevin Cherkauer
> Software Engineer
> IBM Informix Dynamic Server -- Database Kernel
>
>
> "Kevin Cherkauer" <invalid_address@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:fvt3g8$c9o$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>I just tried this on recent builds of the next-to-be-released 10.00, 
>>11.10, and 11.50 versions (currently these are numbered 10.00.xC9, 
>>11.10.xC2W3, 11.50.xC2; of course these numbers might change and my 
>>posting this is no guarantee from IBM that these will necessarily be 
>>released...), and it worked correctly on all of them. All of these were
on 
>>64-bit x86 Linux. The same query also worked against a regular table on 
>>all of them. (sysmaster tables are not normal tables -- they are what we

>>call pseudotables. The code to access them produces them out of thin
air, 
>>or rather out of the contents of memory on the fly, so it's possible for

>>some things to be broken for particular sysmaster tables that work 
>>correctly for other sysmaster tables and normal tables.)
>>
>> This has the flavor of a bug that has already been found and fixed in 
>> later fixpacks. I will ask the optimizer team if they know of any such 
>> fix having been done.
>>
>> -- 
>> Kevin Cherkauer
>> Software Engineer
>> IBM Informix Dynamic Server -- Database Kernel
>>
>>
>> "piotrek" <piotrUSUN_T_O110@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:fvsfda$4q7$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 10.00.UC5  on redhat
>>>
>>> Try this:
>>> SELECT MIN(colno) FROM syscolumns WHERE colno>=1 AND colno>1
>>> An the  answer is ..... 1
>>> A know that stupid questions generates stupid answers but still....
>>>
>>> Anyone has come to that?
>>
>>
>
>
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-07 16:39:22 
Re: reliability?
Michael Krzepkowski <m  2008-05-07 15:43:40 
Re: reliability?
"Kevin Cherkauer&quo  2008-05-07 13:31:11 
Re: reliability?
"Kevin Cherkauer&quo  2008-05-07 14:41:21 
Re: reliability?
"Bingjie Miao"   2008-05-07 16:42:16 
Re: reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-08 11:00:28 
Re: reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-08 12:12:47 
Re: reliability?
"david@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-08 17:21:09 
Re: reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-09 14:29:36 
Re: reliability?
"Neil Truby" &l  2008-05-09 14:36:59 
Re: reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-10 07:08:39 
Re: reliability?
"Neil Truby" &l  2008-05-10 09:42:56 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 23:54:15 CST 2008.