Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Informix > RE: reliability...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 8 Topic 13996 of 14272
Post > Topic >>

RE: reliability?

by "Denham, Mark" <Mark.Denham@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 09:25 AM

I'm not sure that makes IDS unique....i've seen other vendors do this.
Typi=
cally they all copy each other!

I thought IBM changed the way the s/w was licensed so that you didn't
"buy"=
 the product at all. Rather you pay maintenance...aka lease the s/w. I
also=
 thought that under these terms if you stopped paying maintenance you
shoul=
d stop using the s/w. It's been a long time since i've had to bother about
=
such details.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: informix-list-bounces@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:informix-list-bounces@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Behalf Of piotrek
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 6:13 AM
> To: informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: reliability?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> "piotrek" <piotrUSUN_T_O110@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message=20
> news:fvufun$d14$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > one more short question:
> > How to obtain fix?
> > Sure - I can find it on fixcentral but as far as I know our=20
> client has no=20
> > more active sup****t...
> >
>=20
> In other words:
> is it true that we have to pay extra for any (even most=20
> critical) fix to=20
> IDS??
> If so - this makes Informix an unique rdbms (or any other) software=20
> vendor...
> Especially taking into account IDS buggynes....
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Informix-list mailing list
> Informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
>=20




Notice of Confidentiality: **This E-mail and any of its attachments may
con=
tain=20
Lincoln National Cor****ation proprietary information, which is privileged,
=
confidential,
or subject to copyright belonging to the Lincoln National Cor****ation
famil=
y of=20
companies. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or
=
entity to=20
which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this
E-mail=
, you are=20
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action
ta=
ken in=20
relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly
proh=
ibited=20
and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please
noti=
fy the=20
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
this=
 E-mail=20
and any printout. Thank You.**
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
RE: reliability?
"Denham, Mark"   2008-05-08 09:25:32 
Re: reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-08 15:35:31 
Re: reliability?
Michael Krzepkowski <m  2008-05-08 15:49:19 
Re: reliability?
"Andrew Ford" &  2008-05-08 09:08:58 
Re: reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-08 16:43:41 
Re: reliability?
"Neil Truby" &l  2008-05-08 17:03:18 
Re: reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-08 18:13:20 
Re: reliability?
"Neil Truby" &l  2008-05-08 17:37:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 16:25:33 CDT 2008.