Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Informix > RE: reliability...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 14002 of 14272
Post > Topic >>

RE: reliability?

by "Denham, Mark" <Mark.Denham@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 12:44 PM

>In automotive industry they are even installing a path for you (product=20
> recall)

A great example....and IDS sup****t works almost the same. To determine a
pr=
oblem with a component a track record has to be established. This means
tha=
t many customers go to the dealer, or their favorite repair shop and pay
fo=
r diagnosis/repair. Even if the part is covered by warranty you coud still
=
have to pay for the labor. You will have to pay for both if your warranty
h=
as expired (an extended warranty is just like paying for sup****t).

Only when a recall is issued can the rest of the customers benefit - and
th=
at's where IDS falls short. Then again you don't get the equivalent of a
mo=
del upgrade for each recall!

Anyone who runs critical production systems without sup****t is quite mad
in=
 my view. If they are a publicly traded US company then maybe they are
fall=
ing fowl of federal regs too - the ones that came into play after 911. I
wo=
uld say that not being able to run a production system is just as bad as
mi=
nd numbingly dumb as not having good backups to recover one!

There's always the other option too....fix the app that is generating a
daf=
t query....using the free sup****t it gets.




Notice of Confidentiality: **This E-mail and any of its attachments may
con=
tain=20
Lincoln National Cor****ation proprietary information, which is privileged,
=
confidential,
or subject to copyright belonging to the Lincoln National Cor****ation
famil=
y of=20
companies. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or
=
entity to=20
which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this
E-mail=
, you are=20
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action
ta=
ken in=20
relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly
proh=
ibited=20
and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please
noti=
fy the=20
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
this=
 E-mail=20
and any printout. Thank You.**
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
RE: reliability?
"Denham, Mark"   2008-05-08 12:44:10 
Re: reliability?
"piotrek" <p  2008-05-08 19:00:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 16:41:14 CDT 2008.