Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Informix > Re: archecker q...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 14004 of 15119
Post > Topic >>

Re: archecker question

by TBP <thebigpotato@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 07:27 PM

Chris Salch wrote:
> HPUX 11i IDS 9.40.HC5
> 
> I'm seeing this message in an archecker log file.
> 
> STATUS: Checking carstrain:syssyntable
> STATUS: Checking 0x00200B89:
> ERROR: bad extent number 0 -- only 0 extents.
> ERROR: Unable to convert logical address to physical address.
> STATUS: Checking 0x00200B8A:
> ERROR: bad extent number 0 -- only 0 extents.
> ERROR: Unable to convert logical address to physical address.
> 
> A google search reveals a reference to a bug fixed in version 10.xx
> 
> bug_number      172181
> description     ARCHECKER RETURNS MISLEADING ERROR MESSAGE LIKE "ERROR:
BAD EXTENT NUMBER 0 -- ONLY 0 EXTENTS." WITH IN-PLACE ALTER TABLE
PARTITION PAGES
> product_code    ONLINE
> component_code  ARCHECKR
> 
> Does this look like what I'm seeing here?  Is there a way to fix
whatever archecker thinks is wrong as upgrading right now is not really an
option.
> 
Get rid of the in-place alters.

i.e. run oncheck -pT 0x200B8a to see what table, and then do (IIRC) :

update table tab1 set (irrelevant column) = (irrelevant column) where 1=1;

Obviously beware of long transactions etc. etc.

If in doubt post the oncheck -pT output for the two tables.

And ... certainly looks like the bug.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
archecker question
Chris Salch <ChrisSalc  2008-05-08 12:35:58 
Re: archecker question
TBP <thebigpotato@[EMA  2008-05-08 19:27:15 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 23:39:14 CST 2008.