This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_010D_01C8CBA4.589DC9B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> ...but are too cheap to pay for the ability to partition tables. =
Isn't that a built in feature of IDS?
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0801doe/
It used to be. It looks like it now comes standard with Enterprise =
Edition, must be purchased as an addition feature for Workgroup Edition =
and is not available in Express Edition.
Andrew
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Ian Michael Gumby=20
To: informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:10 AM
Subject: TPC-E anyone?
Sorry if I'm being impatient, but I was *wondering* if/when we'll see =
any TPC-E benchmarking, that we've been hearing rumors about?
The latest from IBM was a TPC-C using DB2 v 9.5 which was done by the =
hardware folks to thumb their noses at HP. Of course HP responds with =
their latest benchmark, however while the total numbers were lower, the =
cost per transaction was much lower.
And they say that TPC-C is dead.
So what is it going to be?
And one has to ask... Will it be on a blade server, and if so, on the =
cell chip based blades? ;-)
This would kind of kill two birds with one stone. We'll get to see the =
cell in action along with IDS numbers that should shock the rest of the =
world.
But hey! What do I know? My client is just *now* switching to 10g, but =
are too cheap to pay for the ability to partition tables.
Isn't that a built in feature of IDS? (meaning all commercial =
versions?)
-G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
Search that pays you back! Introducing Live Search cashback. Search =
Now!=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
_______________________________________________
Informix-list mailing list
Informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
------=_NextPart_000_010D_01C8CBA4.589DC9B0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<STYLE>.hmmessage P {
PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: =
0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px
}
BODY.hmmessage {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
</STYLE>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3314" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY class=3Dhmmessage bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>> ...but are too cheap to pay for the ability =
to=20
partition tables. Isn't that a built in feature of =
IDS?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial><A=20
href=3D"http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0801=
doe/">http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0801do=
e/</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>It used to be. It looks like it now comes =
standard=20
with Enterprise Edition, must be purchased as an addition feature for =
Workgroup=20
Edition and is not available in Express Edition.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Andrew</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dim_gumby@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
href=3D"mailto:im_gumby@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">Ian Michael=20
Gumby</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dinformix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
href=3D"mailto:informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, June 11, 2008 =
9:10=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> TPC-E anyone?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Sorry if I'm being impatient, but I was *wondering* =
if/when=20
we'll see any TPC-E benchmarking, that we've been hearing rumors=20
about?<BR><BR>The latest from IBM was a TPC-C using DB2 v 9.5 which =
was done=20
by the hardware folks to thumb their noses at HP. Of course HP =
responds with=20
their latest benchmark, however while the total numbers were lower, =
the cost=20
per transaction was much lower.<BR><BR>And they say that TPC-C is=20
dead.<BR><BR>So what is it going to be?<BR><BR>And one has to ask... =
Will it=20
be on a blade server, and if so, on the cell chip based blades?=20
;-)<BR><BR>This would kind of kill two birds with one stone. We'll get =
to see=20
the cell in action along with IDS numbers that should shock the rest =
of the=20
world.<BR><BR>But hey! What do I know? My client is just *now* =
switching to=20
10g, but are too cheap to pay for the ability to partition =
tables.<BR>Isn't=20
that a built in feature of IDS? (meaning all commercial=20
versions?)<BR><BR>-G<BR><BR><BR>
<HR>
Search that pays you back! Introducing Live Search cashback. <A=20
=
href=3D"http://search.live.com/cashback/?&pkw=3Dform=3DMIJAAF/publ=3D=
HMTGL/crea=3Dsrchpaysyouback"=20
target=3D_new>Search Now!</A>=20
<P>
<HR>
=
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>Informix-list=20
mailing=20
=
list<BR>Informix-list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/in=
formix-list<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_010D_01C8CBA4.589DC9B0--
|
