Ian Michael Gumby said:
> On Jul 5, 2:20 pm, InDeep <ind...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Ian Michael Gumby wrote:
>> > Second, you don't use LAMP in building/maintaining a warehouse
>> > distribution system. You don't use LAMP on your core financial system
>> > either.
>>
>> Don't be so sure.
>>
>
> Oh I am sure.
> We're not talking about an Apropos client with 40 stores (max). We're
> talking about a retailer with probably 20+ warehouse distribution
> sites, and over 120 stores or more. Not including the specialty
> stores.
>
> LAMP doesn't fill that need.
>
> LAMP could realistically fit one area. Store systems.
I disagree, having seen a retailer trying to deploy their store systems
using LAMP. As far as I can tell, LAMP is suitable only for proofs of
concept.
But hey! What do I know?
--
Bye now,
Obnoxio
"There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason
and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you, and in your
panic you turned to the Labour Party. They promised you order, they
promised you peace, and all they demanded in return was your silent,
obedient consent."
|
