Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Microsoft Access > Re: Discerpancy...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 22 Topic 30240 of 31596
Post > Topic >>

Re: Discerpancy in number of records

by "Larry Linson" <bouncer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 09:02 PM

<rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:krah24lbrfi0mo2dj65agmg0s334eps6pm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm using Access 2000. I have a raher simple database of my CD
collection, 
> with
> just three fields, Artist, Album Title and Type of Music. While going to

> update
> it today with a couple new CD's, I noticed that if I sort alphabetically

> by
> Artist it have 387 records but if I sort by Album Title it shows 393 
> records.
> Any idea why this would be?  And I know of at least two titles that
don't 
> show
> up when I look for them under the Artist sort. There's obviously a few 
> more
> missing. Thanks.

Access 2000 is "out of sup****t", but the Service Packs and other updates
are 
still available -- my first step would be to look at "Help | About
Microsoft 
Access 2000" and make certain that it is at the SP3 level; then go to the 
Microsoft site for Office update and see if there are later updates.

If you are up-to-date, or if you still experience this after bringing your

Access up to date, go into Query Builder, on the leftmost part of the 
toolbar, click the dropdown, choose SQL view, copy the SQL for both
querys, 
paste it into a response to this thread, and maybe someone will have a
good 
suggestion.

 Larry Linson
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:47:37 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-12 21:02:14 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 17:45:48 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 18:48:41 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-12 23:30:12 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"David W. Fenton&quo  2008-05-13 03:22:36 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 16:31:38 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Mark" <mree  2008-05-13 22:28:45 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 17:55:08 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 15:04:42 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 19:14:44 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 17:22:12 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 21:52:06 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 20:53:34 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Arno R" <ar  2008-05-14 13:18:06 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-14 22:30:21 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Arno R" <ar  2008-05-15 00:54:09 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 21:20:49 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 19:20:07 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-15 05:17:59 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
Alan <fyz@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-16 20:40:14 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-17 06:05:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 11:39:27 CST 2008.