Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Microsoft Access > Re: Discerpancy...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 9 of 22 Topic 30240 of 31296
Post > Topic >>

Re: Discerpancy in number of records

by rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 13, 2008 at 05:55 PM

On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:28:45 +0100, "Mark" <mreed1975@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>By "Compact", he means a built in functionality of Access.
>
>From the Menu
>
>Tools
>
>Database Utilities
>
>Compact and Repair database
>
>The compact and repair will try to repair any corrupt indices.
>
>Regards,
>
>Mark
>
><rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:piuj24p8qb3ors3j2kt1mi9t64uitmoq07@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 13 May 2008 03:22:36 GMT, "David W. Fenton" 
>> <XXXusenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote in
>>>news:krah24lbrfi0mo2dj65agmg0s334eps6pm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> if I sort alphabetically by
>>>> Artist it have 387 records but if I sort by Album Title it shows
>>>> 393 records. Any idea why this would be?
>>>
>>>This is a classic symptom of a corrupted index. Make a backup copy
>>>of your data MDB and compact it. If the index was corrupted, that
>>>will be re****ted to you and you'll have to recreate it.
>>
>> Thanks. By compact it, do you mean zip it with something like Winzip? 
>> Also, if
>> this index is corrupted, how do I recreate it? I am a very casual user
of 
>> Access
>> and only have a few simple databases for some collections I have and I 
>> don't
>> know the ins and outs of the program. Thanks again.
>> 
>

Okay, thanks. I just tried this. Doesn't appear that anything happened.
The
database was open, I used the compact/repair feature. The database closed
back
to the box I get where I click on it initially to open it. No messages
about not
being able to repair it or anything. When I open it up, the number
difference is
still there. I tried it on both sorts.
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:47:37 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-12 21:02:14 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 17:45:48 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 18:48:41 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-12 23:30:12 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"David W. Fenton&quo  2008-05-13 03:22:36 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 16:31:38 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Mark" <mree  2008-05-13 22:28:45 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 17:55:08 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 15:04:42 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 19:14:44 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 17:22:12 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 21:52:06 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 20:53:34 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Arno R" <ar  2008-05-14 13:18:06 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-14 22:30:21 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Arno R" <ar  2008-05-15 00:54:09 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 21:20:49 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 19:20:07 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-15 05:17:59 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
Alan <fyz@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-16 20:40:14 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-17 06:05:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 12:57:00 CDT 2008.