Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Microsoft Access > Re: Discerpancy...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 22 Topic 30240 of 31596
Post > Topic >>

Re: Discerpancy in number of records

by lyle fairfield <lyle.fairfield@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 09:20 PM

On May 13, 11:53=A0pm, lyle fairfield <lyle.fairfi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 13, 9:52=A0pm, rfd...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:22:12 -0700 (PDT), lyle fairfield
>
> > <lyle.fairfi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >On May 13, 7:14=A0pm, rfd...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 13 May 2008 15:04:42 -0700 (PDT), lyle fairfield
>
> > >> <lyle.fairfi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> >On May 13, 5:55=A0pm, rfd...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > >> >> On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:28:45 +0100, "Mark"
<mreed1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> >> >By "Compact", he means a built in functionality of Access.
>
> > >> >> >From the Menu
>
> > >> >> >Tools
>
> > >> >> >Database Utilities
>
> > >> >> >Compact and Repair database
>
> > >> >> >The compact and repair will try to repair any corrupt indices.
>
> > >> >> >Regards,
>
> > >> >> >Mark
>
> > >> >> ><rfd...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >> >> >news:piuj24p8qb3ors3j2kt1mi9t64uitmoq07@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >> >> On 13 May 2008 03:22:36 GMT, "David W. Fenton"
> > >> >> >> <XXXuse...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >> >> >> wrote:
>
> > >> >> >>>rfd...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote in
> > >> >> >>>news:krah24lbrfi0mo2dj65agmg0s334eps6pm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >> >> >>>> if I sort alphabetically by
> > >> >> >>>> Artist it have 387 records but if I sort by Album Title it
sh=
ows
> > >> >> >>>> 393 records. Any idea why this would be?
>
> > >> >> >>>This is a classic symptom of a corrupted index. Make a backup
c=
opy
> > >> >> >>>of your data MDB and compact it. If the index was corrupted,
th=
at
> > >> >> >>>will be re****ted to you and you'll have to recreate it.
>
> > >> >> >> Thanks. By compact it, do you mean zip it with something like
W=
inzip?
> > >> >> >> Also, if
> > >> >> >> this index is corrupted, how do I recreate it? I am a very
casu=
al user of
> > >> >> >> Access
> > >> >> >> and only have a few simple databases for some collections I
hav=
e and I
> > >> >> >> don't
> > >> >> >> know the ins and outs of the program. Thanks again.
>
> > >> >> Okay, thanks. I just tried this. Doesn't appear that anything
happ=
ened. The
> > >> >> database was open, I used the compact/repair feature. The
database=
 closed back
> > >> >> to the box I get where I click on it initially to open it. No
mess=
ages about not
> > >> >> being able to repair it or anything. When I open it up, the
number=
 difference is
> > >> >> still there. I tried it on both sorts.
>
> > >> >I guess the db isn't huge? Why not zip it up and post it somewhere
f=
or
> > >> >downloading so that we can see this miracle for ourselves?
>
> > >> The .mdb file is 100Kb. Where should I post it?
>
> > >E-mail it to me lyle dot fairfield at gmail dot com and I'll post it
> > >and post the link here.
>
> > Thanks but no need. I realized I could upload it to my own website and
i=
t can be
> > downloaded from there. The link is:
>
> >http://www.folkusa.org/CD_DISKS.mdb
>
> I usually know what to say, but not this time.

I thought of something:
Perhaps, those who were about to expunge Access from their hard drives
and remove it from their application development repertoire because of
the anomaly re****ted in the original post should examine
http://www.folkusa.org/CD_DISKS.mdb
before doing so.
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:47:37 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-12 21:02:14 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 17:45:48 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 18:48:41 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-12 23:30:12 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"David W. Fenton&quo  2008-05-13 03:22:36 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 16:31:38 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Mark" <mree  2008-05-13 22:28:45 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 17:55:08 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 15:04:42 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 19:14:44 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 17:22:12 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 21:52:06 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 20:53:34 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Arno R" <ar  2008-05-14 13:18:06 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-14 22:30:21 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Arno R" <ar  2008-05-15 00:54:09 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
lyle fairfield <lyle.f  2008-05-13 21:20:49 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
rfdjr1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 19:20:07 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-15 05:17:59 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
Alan <fyz@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-16 20:40:14 
Re: Discerpancy in number of records
"Larry Linson"   2008-05-17 06:05:32 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 11:36:36 CST 2008.