Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Oracle Miscellaneous > Re: Messed Up Q...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 6 Topic 6863 of 7280
Post > Topic >>

Re: Messed Up Query

by Robert Klemme <shortcutter@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 30, 2008 at 11:42 PM

On 29.04.2008 14:51, Mtek wrote:
> On Apr 29, 4:18 am, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 7:51 pm, Mtek <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I have this query:
>>> SELECT q10.q10_count,
>>>
vi.mgr_flag,vi.inst_type,vi.inst_num,vi.inst_cst,vi.inst_zip,vi.inst_phone,vi.url,vi.turnover,vi.hold_cnt,
>>> vi.date_,vi.inst_size,vi.inst_dchg,
>>>
vh.ticker,vh.q0_shares,vh.q1_shares,vh.q0q1_grwth,vh.q0q1_dchg,vh.shares_out,
>>> mt.comp_name, sd.sector_name, p.closing
>>> FROM vinst vi, vhold vh, master_table mt, stock_data sd, prices p,
>>>      (SELECT count(*) q10_count FROM vhold vh
>>>       WHERE q1_shares = 0 GROUP BY vh.ticker) q10
>>> WHERE inst_name = 'Yacktman Fund'
>>>   AND vi.inst_num = vh.inst_num
>>>   AND vh.ticker = mt.ticker
>>>   AND mt.m_ticker = sd.m_ticker
>>>   AND mt.m_ticker = p.m_ticker;
>>> Take a look at the inner query in the FROM clause:
>>>      (SELECT count(*) q10_count FROM vhold vh
>>>       WHERE q1_shares = 0 GROUP BY vh.ticker) q10
>>> I basically need the same criteria applied as the outer query.  Do I
>>> have to re-list the criteria?  I'll have to do that count for 5
>>> fields.  It will make this query WAY long.......
>> I don't see a join with q10.  Is a cross join really what you intend?
> 
> Well, what I am trying to do is to select a bunch of data, then in the
> same query, I want to do a count on a column with it;s own criteria
> based on the results of the original select.
> 
> Does that make sense?

I'm afraid, no.  Maybe I'm too tired right now but "select a bunch of 
data" is not very precise.  It is especially unclear to me whether you 
need the "bunch" only for counting purposes or are interested in the 
result as well.

Also, your remark "based on the results of the original select" might 
indicate that you have a too procedural view of SQL.

> Can an OVER help me here?  I'm trying to look at it and understand
> it.......

Maybe.  Can you try to explain more elaborately what you have as input 
and expect as output?

Kind regards

	robert
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Messed Up Query
Mtek <mtek@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-28 10:51:20 
Re: Messed Up Query
Peter Nilsson <airia@[  2008-04-28 16:17:54 
Re: Messed Up Query
Robert Klemme <shortcu  2008-04-29 02:18:21 
Re: Messed Up Query
Mtek <mtek@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-29 05:20:06 
Re: Messed Up Query
Mtek <mtek@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-29 05:51:16 
Re: Messed Up Query
Robert Klemme <shortcu  2008-04-30 23:42:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 0:25:08 CST 2008.