"fitzjarrell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <oratune@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:d52ab77a-3007-4d4b-9e0b-4e1cc73cc041@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
May 9, 8:47 am, bho****r <bhona...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> > The question I have is, is there any downside to me buying, say, a
32G
>> > box and setting the SGA size at 20G? Will I actually end up harming
my
>> > performance with an over-large SGA (assuming I have enough physical
>> > memory to keep the box out of swap)?
>>
>> Since everyone is busy telling you how to tune instead of answering
>> your question, you might have to infer that the answer is "No, there
>> is no downside to adding memory." That's my takeaway from no
>> negatives pointed out anyway...
>
> Then you're not reading the entire thread, as I posted that installing
> all of the physical memory a server can accept, then allocating 80% of
> that to the database would be wasteful, to say the least. Knowing
> that this is a Windows operating sytem, which requires 2 gig for the
> operating system alone, may make that 80% allocation 'impossible' thus
> creating a scenario of constant paging/swapping to/from disk. Of
> course even a successful allocation of that much memory to the SGA
> would create a paging/swapping situation as PGA components may require
> more free memory than is available. Which, in turn, sends performance
> into the proverbial dumpster.
How did you reach the conclusion the OP is running Windows? I saw nothing
in
their posts which indicated which OS they were using.
Mike
|
