by haomiao <miaohaoz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 4, 2008 at 05:16 PM
> The two systems could have different NLS_DATE_FORMAT ;
> ignoring the fact each piece mentioned above is unsup****ted.
the NLS_DATE_FORMAT in both systems is same
YYYYMMSSHH24MISS
both in unix enviroment and oracle session parameter.
If I change the tbl_txn_mon_t.sa_comm_date to 81, ora-1801
disappear. So ora1801 in my sco system should be result of
the wrong length of tbl_txn_mon_t.sa_comm_date.
Why oracle not re****t 1801, instead of "the sa_comm_date is too
short"?
And why Aix not re****t 1801?
