Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Paradox > Re: Same form, ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 33 of 85 Topic 1325 of 1428
Post > Topic >>

Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?

by Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 18, 2008 at 10:33 AM

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:44:14 -0700, "Tony McGuire"
<png.paradoxcommunity@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>Have you checked out the fonts issue brought up by Rick?
>
>That is a very real possibility, and would be system specific.  It is 
>a very real issue when you exceed (800?) a certain # of fonts on a 
>system.

Hi Tony,

The matter is resolved, but the fonts issue was not the
problem. I switched from a cMax to a table to hold the
incrementing integer and that got things humming again.

Please check my response to Jim for the details, and accept
my thanks,
-- 
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."
 




 85 Posts in Topic:
Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 10:47:20 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 12:40:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 14:09:34 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 14:54:53 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 15:00:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 17:29:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 19:55:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 20:30:43 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 23:16:22 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Michael Kennedy <Info@  2008-02-13 12:15:35 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-12 20:43:57 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 23:08:47 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-12 21:34:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Jan Stegehuis <alleyho  2008-02-13 14:59:14 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 10:32:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 08:35:05 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 13:00:02 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 11:04:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 14:47:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 12:48:24 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 15:31:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 13:35:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-14 10:04:03 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-14 09:02:55 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-14 14:37:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-15 08:36:40 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 11:59:35 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-15 10:46:42 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 14:06:42 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-16 05:29:34 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 09:05:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 07:44:14 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 10:33:32 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 08:54:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 11:12:30 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 09:38:05 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 11:51:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 10:02:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 12:37:08 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 13:11:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-17 13:55:28 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-17 13:58:39 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 09:55:17 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-18 10:11:22 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 10:32:26 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rick Rans" <  2008-02-17 17:08:07 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-18 08:04:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 07:39:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 07:28:38 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 19:40:46 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 10:34:13 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-19 10:53:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 11:57:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 21:39:00 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 16:46:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 23:51:17 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 18:16:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-19 16:41:06 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:58:59 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 20:00:50 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 19:51:49 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 20:52:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-19 20:20:30 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 22:26:37 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:17:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-20 08:26:03 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:39:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rick Rans" <  2008-02-20 09:13:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-20 11:13:50 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 12:00:36 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-20 19:35:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 14:11:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-21 08:02:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-20 12:21:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-21 08:09:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 19:42:32 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 06:55:12 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-21 07:23:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 10:14:37 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-20 19:31:57 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 14:13:20 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-20 16:40:33 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-18 13:02:08 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 14:40:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth Porter <shiva.  2008-02-15 18:39:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 22:04:26 CST 2008.