Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Paradox > Re: Same form, ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 49 of 85 Topic 1325 of 1428
Post > Topic >>

Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?

by "Anders Jonsson" <gt3TakeThisAway@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 19, 2008 at 07:28 AM

>
> Could you please say something more. I have no idea what you
> mean.

There have been cases when the use of stylesheets mess things up. I can't 
remember the details but I think it had something to do with using a style

sheed on the design PC that doesn't exist on the one running the form. The

question was put to the group to see if they could jump in.

Anyway, I see that you got further by removing the cMax call. Good, but I 
can't really figure out why this would cause Paradox to crash. As others 
have said, using cMax in a multi-user environment is a bad idea but it 
shouldn't bring Paradox down.

Anders
 




 85 Posts in Topic:
Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 10:47:20 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 12:40:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 14:09:34 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 14:54:53 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 15:00:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 17:29:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 19:55:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 20:30:43 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 23:16:22 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Michael Kennedy <Info@  2008-02-13 12:15:35 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-12 20:43:57 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 23:08:47 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-12 21:34:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Jan Stegehuis <alleyho  2008-02-13 14:59:14 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 10:32:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 08:35:05 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 13:00:02 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 11:04:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 14:47:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 12:48:24 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 15:31:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 13:35:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-14 10:04:03 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-14 09:02:55 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-14 14:37:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-15 08:36:40 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 11:59:35 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-15 10:46:42 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 14:06:42 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-16 05:29:34 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 09:05:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 07:44:14 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 10:33:32 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 08:54:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 11:12:30 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 09:38:05 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 11:51:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 10:02:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 12:37:08 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 13:11:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-17 13:55:28 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-17 13:58:39 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 09:55:17 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-18 10:11:22 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 10:32:26 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rick Rans" <  2008-02-17 17:08:07 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-18 08:04:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 07:39:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 07:28:38 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 19:40:46 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 10:34:13 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-19 10:53:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 11:57:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 21:39:00 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 16:46:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 23:51:17 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 18:16:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-19 16:41:06 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:58:59 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 20:00:50 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 19:51:49 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 20:52:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-19 20:20:30 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 22:26:37 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:17:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-20 08:26:03 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:39:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rick Rans" <  2008-02-20 09:13:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-20 11:13:50 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 12:00:36 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-20 19:35:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 14:11:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-21 08:02:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-20 12:21:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-21 08:09:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 19:42:32 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 06:55:12 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-21 07:23:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 10:14:37 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-20 19:31:57 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 14:13:20 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-20 16:40:33 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-18 13:02:08 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 14:40:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth Porter <shiva.  2008-02-15 18:39:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 22:18:09 CST 2008.