Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Paradox > Re: Same form, ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 53 of 85 Topic 1325 of 1400
Post > Topic >>

Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?

by Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:53:31 -0500, Dennis Santoro
<RDAPres@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

Hi Denn,

Please see my comments inline below...

>If you do the query to an in memory tcursor (see wantinmemorytcursor in 
>the opal help) then the c functions should be fine as you are now 
>completely local.

I just tried the wantinmemorytcursor approach, but still get
the GPF on that one machine.

> It is using cfunctions against shared tables that is 
>the problem. But if you want to display a total why not just put a 
>sumarry field on the form? Of course it will depend a little on your 
>data model but if all the items are related to one check then it would 
>seem you would have a structure like

My present DM will not allow that approach...

>
>Check.db-->>Detail.db so placing a filed for the detail amount and 
>making it a sum would show you the total for that check. Also you can 
>likely avoid the query by using the index field for your link from check 
>to detail and a setrange which will be light years faster than a query 
>if you can't do it with just placing a field.

I'll try the setRange approach...

Thanks!

>
>Denn Santoro
>President
>Resource Development Associates
>http://www.RDAWorldWide.Com
>Offices in the United States and Germany
>Providing solutions to health care, business, governments and 
>non-profits since 1982
>
>Kenneth wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:40:46 +1100, Tom Krieg
>> <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>> IIRC, c-functions place a table lock on the table. Maybe the crash has

>>> to do with the way the BDE is set up on that computer? (Local share, 
>>> path to the net directory) or oplocks or write-cacheing or max file 
>>> handles or buffer sizes. Maybe there is a lock issue, or the lock
files 
>>> have maxed-out.
>>>
>>> Doing a registry clean-up with a commercial registry cleaner has 
>>> sometimes fixed inexplicable problems and crashes for me (not with 
>>> Paradox but Windows and other software).
>>>
>>> Just thinking out loud.
>>>
>>> TomK
>>>
>>> Anders Jonsson wrote:
>>>> using cMax in a multi-user environment is a bad idea but it 
>>>> shouldn't bring Paradox down.
>>>>
>> 
>> Hello to all,
>> 
>> I have the form working well, but have a question:
>> 
>> I wanted to add a button that would display the sum of all
>> entries written on a particular check.
>> 
>> The code runs a query, then a tCursor cSum to get the total.
>> 
>> But, as is now familiar, on all machines but one, this works
>> fine, but that one machine GPFs when the button is clicked.
>> 
>> Based on the other problems I have had, it would appear that
>> the difficulty is in my using cSum to get the total.
>> 
>> That surprised me because, (though I am accessing the form
>> over our Lan) the cSum process itself would seem to be local
>> to each machine, that is, it evaluates the cSum on the
>> ANSWER.DB that is in the :PRIV: local to each machine.
>> 
>> Why might that be causing the GPF?
>> 
>> Also, what is another (better) way for me to get the sum?
>> 
>> Sincere thanks,
-- 
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."
 




 85 Posts in Topic:
Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 10:47:20 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 12:40:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 14:09:34 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 14:54:53 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 15:00:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 17:29:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 19:55:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 20:30:43 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 23:16:22 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Michael Kennedy <Info@  2008-02-13 12:15:35 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-12 20:43:57 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 23:08:47 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-12 21:34:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Jan Stegehuis <alleyho  2008-02-13 14:59:14 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 10:32:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 08:35:05 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 13:00:02 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 11:04:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 14:47:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 12:48:24 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 15:31:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 13:35:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-14 10:04:03 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-14 09:02:55 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-14 14:37:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-15 08:36:40 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 11:59:35 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-15 10:46:42 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 14:06:42 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-16 05:29:34 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 09:05:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 07:44:14 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 10:33:32 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 08:54:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 11:12:30 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 09:38:05 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 11:51:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 10:02:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 12:37:08 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 13:11:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-17 13:55:28 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-17 13:58:39 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 09:55:17 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-18 10:11:22 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 10:32:26 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rick Rans" <  2008-02-17 17:08:07 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-18 08:04:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 07:39:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 07:28:38 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 19:40:46 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 10:34:13 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-19 10:53:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 11:57:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 21:39:00 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 16:46:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 23:51:17 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 18:16:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-19 16:41:06 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:58:59 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 20:00:50 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 19:51:49 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 20:52:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-19 20:20:30 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 22:26:37 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:17:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-20 08:26:03 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:39:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rick Rans" <  2008-02-20 09:13:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-20 11:13:50 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 12:00:36 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-20 19:35:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 14:11:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-21 08:02:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-20 12:21:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-21 08:09:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 19:42:32 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 06:55:12 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-21 07:23:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 10:14:37 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-20 19:31:57 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 14:13:20 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-20 16:40:33 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-18 13:02:08 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 14:40:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth Porter <shiva.  2008-02-15 18:39:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 21 19:57:49 CDT 2008.