Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Paradox > Re: Same form, ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 65 of 85 Topic 1325 of 1428
Post > Topic >>

Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?

by Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 20, 2008 at 10:17 AM

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:20:30 -0700, "Tony McGuire"
<png.paradoxcommunity@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>> Please forgive my ignorance, but do you mean the actual User
>> name? Or do you mean as did Anders, the length of the path
>> to Priv?
>
>
>Please forgive my pu****ness, but did you try it with a shorter :PRIV: 
>?
>
>Does it make any difference?

Hi Tony,

I came into the office intending to try the shorter :PRIV:
on the offending machine.

The system was running when I came in.

I launched Paradox, opened the form that causes the GPFs,
entered a test disbursement, clicked on the "total for this
check" button that generated the GPFs, but, to my surprise,
it displayed the total properly.

So, I repeated the above. Many times...

I could not generate the GPF no matter what I tried.

Next, I re-booted, repeated the whole drill, and again,
there were no GPFs. I simply could not recreate the GPF
problem.

But as I did all this, I did notice that the labels on
fields were "breaking up" in an odd way: It appeared as if
tiny "pieces" of the individual characters were being
attracted to, and then attaching to the next character. The
font was not TrueType; it was MS Sans Serif.

I soon saw that if I closed Paradox, re-launched it, and
opened the form in design mode, it looked fine.

But then, if I clicked to run the form, the font broke up as
I have described.

If, at that point, I put it back into design mode, the
characters remained "damaged."

When I saw that, I saved the form, then copied it to create
another.

On that second form, I changed the labels to Arial, and
after several tries that seems stable.

So that is the current status...

I am well aware that diagnosing such a situation is all the
more difficult if it is intermittent, but that is where we
stand right now.

I have not, by the way, shortened the length of the :PRIV:
path at this point because I don't want to further confound
my variables.

Sincere thanks as before for any thoughts you might have,
-- 
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."
 




 85 Posts in Topic:
Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 10:47:20 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 12:40:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 14:09:34 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 14:54:53 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 15:00:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 17:29:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 19:55:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 20:30:43 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-12 23:16:22 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Michael Kennedy <Info@  2008-02-13 12:15:35 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-12 20:43:57 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-12 23:08:47 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-12 21:34:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Jan Stegehuis <alleyho  2008-02-13 14:59:14 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 10:32:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 08:35:05 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 13:00:02 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 11:04:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 14:47:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 12:48:24 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-13 15:31:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-13 13:35:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-14 10:04:03 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-14 09:02:55 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-14 14:37:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-15 08:36:40 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 11:59:35 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-15 10:46:42 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 14:06:42 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rodney Wise" &  2008-02-16 05:29:34 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 09:05:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 07:44:14 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 10:33:32 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 08:54:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 11:12:30 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 09:38:05 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 11:51:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-18 10:02:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 12:37:08 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 13:11:44 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-17 13:55:28 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-17 13:58:39 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 09:55:17 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Jim Moseley" &  2008-02-18 10:11:22 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 10:32:26 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rick Rans" <  2008-02-17 17:08:07 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-18 08:04:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 07:39:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 07:28:38 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 19:40:46 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 10:34:13 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-19 10:53:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 11:57:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 21:39:00 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 16:46:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-19 23:51:17 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 18:16:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-19 16:41:06 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:58:59 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 20:00:50 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 19:51:49 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 20:52:16 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-19 20:20:30 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 22:26:37 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:17:19 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-20 08:26:03 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 10:39:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Rick Rans" <  2008-02-20 09:13:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-20 11:13:50 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 12:00:36 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-20 19:35:15 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 14:11:56 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-21 08:02:18 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-20 12:21:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-21 08:09:21 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Tom Krieg <user@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 19:42:32 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 06:55:12 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Tony McGuire"   2008-02-21 07:23:09 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 10:14:37 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
"Anders Jonsson"  2008-02-20 19:31:57 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 14:13:20 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-20 16:40:33 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Dennis Santoro <RDAPre  2008-02-18 13:02:08 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2008-02-18 14:40:31 
Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?
Kenneth Porter <shiva.  2008-02-15 18:39:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 22:21:05 CST 2008.