Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pick > Are (Pick) basi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 19 Topic 3454 of 3595
Post > Topic >>

Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?

by "Ron Walenciak" <ron.walenciak@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 17, 2008 at 08:42 PM

I have a client that has had difficulty finding good Pick programmers (no, 
they don't want to hire consultants/contractors); as a subset of that,
they 
then looked to see whether Basic programmers were available, and the 
universities had few Basic classes, but lots of Java, .net, etc.) So, that

led them to believe that not only was Pick Basic obsolete, but that Basic 
itself was obsolete. That (along with other marketing issues that are too 
long to go into) led to thoughts of converting from D3 to something else; 
Universe would be a good choice if they could be convinced to stay with a 
multivalue data model (there are some pluses there, obviously),  except
for 
the Basic resource issue.

I can argue the other issues that came up, and I'm convinced that looking
at 
schools wasn't the right way to come up with an answer to this resource 
question, but I'm not sure how else it can be negated. Keeping emotion out

of it, are there any statistics or studies on the numbers of Basic 
programmers in the work force or sources of Basic programmers for the 
future?

Thanks,
Ron
 




 19 Posts in Topic:
Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
"Ron Walenciak"  2008-04-17 20:42:30 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
Kevin Powick <kpowick@  2008-04-17 14:34:39 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
dmontaine <dmontaine@[  2008-04-17 15:13:19 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
International Spectrum &l  2008-04-17 15:31:56 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
"frosty" <fr  2008-04-18 09:33:52 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
GlenB <batchelg@[EMAIL  2008-04-17 14:59:30 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
dawn <dawnwolthuis@[EM  2008-04-17 16:48:03 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
x <lucian_pata@[EMAIL   2008-04-18 10:39:08 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
"Ron Walenciak"  2008-04-19 17:10:45 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
dbenedict99@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-04-18 12:07:22 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
Symeon <symeonb@[EMAIL  2008-04-23 02:15:48 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
NoGodForMe <religionki  2008-05-28 22:33:41 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
Tronic <ttrroonniicc@[  2008-05-28 23:11:55 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
Joe <lunch@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-29 15:43:49 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
mvdbman <mvdbman@[EMAI  2008-05-29 11:22:29 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
mvdbman <mvdbman@[EMAI  2008-05-29 11:28:29 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
Joe <dinner@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-29 18:38:23 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
Tony Gravagno <address  2008-05-29 19:23:45 
Re: Are (Pick) basic and its programmers "obsolete"?
ddspell-m3 <ddspell@[E  2008-05-29 14:13:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 5 17:54:29 CDT 2008.