Re: -COSI-I-NOTSYSCONCEAL, error

"Bart.Zorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Norman.
> 
> Problem is that we don't have (yet) a service agreement with Oracle. 

	got it.  I hope that you do decide to get one.

>Is there any way to have this put on a bug list or something?

	I've added it to an internal problem re****t.  I suspect that
we'll try to get it addressed in the next rdb 72 release (unnamed 
and not yet fully scheduled for release date).  

> 
> Bart
> 
> Norman Lastovica wrote:
> > curious.  please get in touch with Rdb sup****t and log a call
> > here.  It appears that there is code that explitly looks for
> > "LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE" when a concealed logical is found.  I don't
> > think that this probably is the right check in this case.
> >
> > The reason that the notsysconceal check is there is because
> > the user and the dbr (and I suspect potentially the monitor)
> > all have to have access to the RUJ file.  I think though that
> > maybe this check could be enhanced in this case.
> >
> > "Bart.Zorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" wrote:
> > >
> 
> [ snip ... ]
> 
> > --
> > - - - - -
> >  opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone
> >  and certainly are not intended in any way to
> >  express or represent any opinions or commitment
> >  of oracle cor****ation.
> >
> >  norman lastovica / oracle rdb engineering

-- 
- - - - -
 opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone
 and certainly are not intended in any way to 
 express or represent any opinions or commitment
 of oracle cor****ation.

 norman lastovica / oracle rdb engineering