by Gene Wirchenko <genew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Aug 15, 2007 at 05:20 PM
Josh Assing <XjoshX@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> I am not aware of anything either. I have occasionally wished
>>for something. It could be a useful piece of data that indexes have
>>gotten corrupted or are just fine. ("Have we finally nailed that
>>problem that was resulting in corrupted files?" "No index problems
>>since, so probably.")
>
>It'd be easy enough to write the code to do it -- but like I said -- it'd
take
>longer to check the index that it would to recreate it.
Go ahead. It is not sufficient to check each row against the key
value. One would also have to check that there are no other key
values in the index. I do not see how this could be done without
getting into implementation-dependent code.
As far as it being slower, that is not relevant. Building
indexes and checking indexes are two different things.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.