Re: Naming conventions for special database objects

> the more references I have, the better.<

If you need a collection, you might check these - but if you ask 100
people, you will get 101 oppinions:

http://databases.aspfaq.com/database/what-naming-convention-should-i-use-in-my-database.html
http://www.mydatabasesup****t.com/forums/databases/158246-naming-conventions-columns-primary-otherwise.html
http://www.georgehernandez.com/h/xComputers/Databases/aaIntro/DBNamingConventions.asp
http://www.gplivna.eu/papers/naming_conventions.htm
http://vyaskn.tripod.com/object_naming.htm
http://weblogs.asp.net/jamauss/articles/DatabaseNamingConventions.aspx
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/software/aspnet/31774443/naming-convention.aspx
http://www.ss64.com/orasyntax/naming.html
http://www.sqlnewsgroups.net/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/topic11212.aspx
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Naming+Standards/codingstandardspart1/677/
http://justinsomnia.org/writings/naming_conventions.html
https://secure.dss.cahwnet.gov/isd/iess/pms/res/docs/STD_ISB%20Database%20Standards.doc
This is in german only by University of Flensburg:
http://www.wi.fh-flensburg.de/wi/weber/index.php?Datenbankentwurf:Namenskonventionen:Spaltennamen


Brgds

Philipp Post