Re: listing of syntactically possible SQL statements

On May 10, 2:46 pm, lbrt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > >  Also, in which versions of SQL is the <> operator written as != ?
>
> > != is not part of sql standard, it is a vendor extension.
>
>  So, does it mean that some vendors include it as some sort of
> programming-like syntax sugar, but also have the standard   "<>" for
> non-equality?
>
> >http://developer.mimer.com/validator/index.htm
>
>  Thanks and I am also looking for a test set of actual queries to test
> some query parser that I coded.

haven't tried myself, but you might find something useful at:

http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/ctg/sql_form.htm

/Lennart

[...]