by "Roy Hann" <specially@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jun 24, 2008 at 01:15 AM
"Frank Swarbrick" <Frank.Swarbrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:485FC580.6F0F.0085.0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On 6/23/2008 at 10:16 AM, in message
> <485F77F7.6F0F.0085.0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Frank Swarbrick<Frank.Swarbrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Thanks to all who responded. I new feel quite confidant in shooting
this
>> idea down.
>> :-)
>
> Interesting. Here's a page my co-worker is using to justify his
position:
> http://www.dbforums.com/showthread.php?t=1619660
I guess if neither the programmer nor his manager knows what a DBMS is
supposed to provide they won't ever see much harm in subverting it. I
haven't the time or energy to start explaining what's wrong with that, and
no possibility of being rewarded for it if I did. In any case, ignorance
is bliss.
Roy
