>>> On 6/23/2008 at 6:15 PM, in message
<WYGdnWfq9Ldcof3VnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Roy
Hann<specially@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Frank Swarbrick" <Frank.Swarbrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:485FC580.6F0F.0085.0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On 6/23/2008 at 10:16 AM, in message
>> <485F77F7.6F0F.0085.0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Frank Swarbrick<Frank.Swarbrick@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Thanks to all who responded. I new feel quite confidant in shooting
> this
>>> idea down.
>>> :-)
>>
>> Interesting. Here's a page my co-worker is using to justify his
> position:
>> http://www.dbforums.com/showthread.php?t=1619660
>
> I guess if neither the programmer nor his manager knows what a DBMS is
> supposed to provide they won't ever see much harm in subverting it. I
>
> haven't the time or energy to start explaining what's wrong with that,
> and
> no possibility of being rewarded for it if I did. In any case,
> ignorance
> is bliss.
Don't worry. We had 'the meeting' today and we're definitely *not* going
forward with the OTLT 'solution'.
Frank
|
