Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Admin > Re: Server Cras...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 4931 of 5123
Post > Topic >>

Re: Server Crash

by scott.marlowe@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Scott Marlowe") Apr 22, 2008 at 10:21 AM

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott.marlowe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> Kill -9 is the "shoot it in the head" signal.  It is not
>  >> generated by postgresql in normal operation.  It can be
>  >> generated by "pg_ctl -m immediate stop" .  At least I think
>  >> that's what signal it sends.
>
>  Just for the archives: Postgres never generates kill -9 at all.
>  (Immediate stop uses SIGQUIT, instead.)  When you see that in
>  the log, you can be sure it was a manual action or the OOM killer.

Thanks.  Just wondering, what's the difference in behavior from
pgsql's perspective from sigquit and siqkill?  Is sigkill more
dangerous than sigquit?

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Server Crash
scott.marlowe@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-22 10:21:41 
Re: Server Crash
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-04-22 12:32:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 4 14:39:24 CDT 2008.