Re: 8.1.8 autovacuum missing databases

Ian Westmacott wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:12 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Can you verify whether age(pg_database.datfrozenxid) is shrinking
after
> > vacuuming?  If the age() of a database is higher than the applicable
> > max_freeze_age, then it will always be chosen.
> 
> One of the databases is about 1.5TB, so that could take a while.
> Anything else I could look at in the meantime?  The age of these
> databases right now is about 290039577.  Also, autovacuum doesn't always
> choose the same DB, it alternates between template1 and one of mine --
> going back through a couple of months of logs I don't see it ever
> choosing the same one twice in a row.

Right -- if you have two databases over the wraparound edge, it will
alternate between them.

I still think that the autovac is dying before completing the task.  Did
you investigate whether there are "ERROR" messages coming from
autovacuum?  No PG crashes would happen.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                               
http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 sup****t

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin