Re: Orphan TOAST object

"James Farrugia" <james.farrugia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> I wonder whether any of you can help me out with this problem.

What PG version is this?

> To get vacuum the TOAST object we created a tem****ary table foo (col1
> char(1)) and assigned its reltoastrelid (up till now set to 0) to
> pg_toast_35027430's OID and then vacuumed foo.  The plan worked and
> immediately age(datfrozenxid) in pg_database reflected a much younger
XID.

> We then decided to get rid of pg_toast_35027430 by dropping foo.  Foo
> disappeared but pg_toast_35027430 persisted.

Well, yeah, because you didn't create a pg_depend link.

We have seen a couple prior re****ts of toast tables not going away when
their parent was dropped, but nobody's been able to create a
reproducible case yet.  The most likely idea is probably that pg_depend
got corrupted somehow, causing the toast table not to get found by DROP.

Can you find any rows in pg_depend having objid equal to the OID of 
pg_toast_35027430?  Try reindexing pg_depend and then see if you find
any.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin