Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Admin > Re: Orphan TOAS...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 8 Topic 4975 of 5407
Post > Topic >>

Re: Orphan TOAST object

by james.farrugia@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("James Farrugia") May 12, 2008 at 04:41 PM

------=_Part_2286_5640225.1210603283118
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Problem has now been solved.  Thanks a lot for all your help.

On 5/12/08, Tom Lane <tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> "James Farrugia" <james.farrugia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > One last thing...can we run into data-loss problems with successfully
> > vacuumed tables even if there is one unvacuumed database object; what
> would
> > have happened if I ignored to vacuum that rogue pg_toast (which was
the
> only
> > unvacuumed object within the entire database)?
>
> The database would have shut down when you got to the
> 2-billion-transactions mark.  So you'd have had to solve the problem
> sooner or later anyway.
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

------=_Part_2286_5640225.1210603283118
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Problem has now been solved.&nbsp; Thanks a lot for all your help.<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/12/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Tom
Lane</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt;
wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px
0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">&quot;James Farrugia&quot; &lt;<a
href="mailto:james.farrugia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">james.farrugia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt;
writes:<br>
&gt; One last thing...can we run into data-loss problems with
successfully<br>&gt; vacuumed tables even if there is one unvacuumed
database object; what would<br>&gt; have happened if I ignored to vacuum
that rogue pg_toast (which was the only<br>
&gt; unvacuumed object within the entire database)?<br><br>The database
would have shut down when you got to the<br>2-billion-transactions
mark.&nbsp;&nbsp;So you&#39;d have had to solve the problem<br>sooner or
later anyway.<br><br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
regards, tom lane<br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_2286_5640225.1210603283118--
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Orphan TOAST object
james.farrugia@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 18:46:23 
Re: Orphan TOAST object
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-11 13:09:48 
Re: Orphan TOAST object
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-11 13:26:03 
Re: Orphan TOAST object
james.farrugia@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 09:25:34 
Re: Orphan TOAST object
postgresql@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-12 09:35:46 
Re: Orphan TOAST object
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-12 10:08:55 
Re: Orphan TOAST object
james.farrugia@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 10:19:59 
Re: Orphan TOAST object
james.farrugia@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 16:41:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 1:23:36 CDT 2008.