Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Admin > Re: Configuring...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 17 Topic 5102 of 5408
Post > Topic >>

Re: Configuring Shared Buffers

by rafael.domiciano@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Rafael Domiciano") Jun 30, 2008 at 08:41 PM

------=_Part_8184_15146385.1214869298384
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

No, i don't have autova***.
We tried it sometime ago, and the applications began to take "time-out".
I think we don't need autova***, along the day the application don't get
slow, sometimes is faster (maybe the use of the applications is less).
The actual machine is Dual Core Xeon 1.5 and 2 Gb RAM.


2008/6/30 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:

> Rafael Domiciano escribi=F3:
> > Yes, the server just does S, U, I and D.
> > The queries is pretty simples, don't have huge joins across tables...
> > In this server I have around 500 tables, the largest are:
> > 9 millions tuples | 5 millions tuples
> >
> > This server is our "authenticator"; the response is need to be
> "imediatly".
> > Today, the monitoring of the server is done using the unix command:
> > loguptime
> > With the time we discovered that when loguptime is up than 1.0 the
> response
> > begin to late, and the applications begin to take "Time-out".
>
> Have you tuned autovacuum?  Maybe you need it to be more frequent on
> certain tables or something.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>

------=_Part_8184_15146385.1214869298384
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

No, i don&#39;t have autova***.<br>We tried it sometime ago, and the
applic=
ations began to take &quot;time-out&quot;.<br>I think we don&#39;t need
aut=
ova***, along the day the application don&#39;t get slow, sometimes is
fast=
er (maybe the use of the applications is less).<br>
The actual machine is Dual Core Xeon 1.5 and 2 Gb RAM.<br><br><br><div
clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote">2008/6/30 Alvaro Herrera &lt;<a
href=3D"mailto:alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt;:<br><blockquote
class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
margin=
: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Rafael Domiciano escribi=F3:<br>
<div class=3D"Ih2E3d">&gt; Yes, the server just does S, U, I and D.<br>
&gt; The queries is pretty simples, don&#39;t have huge joins across
tables=
....<br>
&gt; In this server I have around 500 tables, the largest are:<br>
&gt; 9 millions tuples | 5 millions tuples<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; This server is our &quot;authenticator&quot;; the response is need to
=
be &quot;imediatly&quot;.<br>
&gt; Today, the monitoring of the server is done using the unix
command:<br=
>
&gt; loguptime<br>
&gt; With the time we discovered that when loguptime is up than 1.0 the
res=
ponse<br>
&gt; begin to late, and the applications begin to take
&quot;Time-out&quot;=
..<br>
<br>
</div>Have you tuned autovacuum? &nbsp;Maybe you need it to be more
frequen=
t on<br>
certain tables or something.<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
Alvaro Herrera &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbs=
p; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<a
href=3D"http://www.Co=
mmandPrompt.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.CommandPrompt.com/</a><br>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_8184_15146385.1214869298384--
 




 17 Posts in Topic:
Configuring Shared Buffers
rafael.domiciano@[EMAIL P  2008-06-30 14:52:05 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
postgresql@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-30 20:28:30 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
rafael.domiciano@[EMAIL P  2008-06-30 16:01:14 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
postgresql@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-30 21:17:10 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-30 21:09:27 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
rafael.domiciano@[EMAIL P  2008-06-30 20:16:02 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-30 19:19:41 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
rafael.domiciano@[EMAIL P  2008-06-30 20:41:38 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-30 19:45:36 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
rafael.domiciano@[EMAIL P  2008-06-30 20:51:05 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-30 19:59:59 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
rafael.domiciano@[EMAIL P  2008-06-30 21:12:47 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
scott.marlowe@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-30 19:05:10 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
scott.marlowe@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-30 20:08:39 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-30 22:38:46 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
kneufeld@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-30 19:43:11 
Re: Configuring Shared Buffers
rafael.domiciano@[EMAIL P  2008-07-01 22:24:49 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 12:58:53 CDT 2008.