On Monday 10 March 2008 21:59, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >> ... there should be two lists, of which you
> >> would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...
> >
> > I've been thinking that for awhile. Core is in a good position to see
> > who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well
> > placed
> > to see who's contributing in a non-code fa****on. If there's going to
> > be recognition for non-code contributions I'd be happy to see that
> > be a
> > separate list managed by someone else. How this all gets presented on
> > the website (one page or several?) is not clear.
>
> I always like to look at how others have done this before.
>
And I am always fascinated how we don't look at how we have done it in the
past.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
--
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
