On Monday 10 March 2008 21:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > ... there should be two lists, of which you
> > would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...
>
> I've been thinking that for awhile. Core is in a good position to see
> who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well placed
> to see who's contributing in a non-code fa****on.
A large part of the problem is that Joshua, for quite some time now, has
been
trying to change the definition of what the contributors on this page
means.
Granted he has been smart about it, getting little things changed over
time
to get closer and closer to his end goal. In the past we kept it with the
original spirit of the page, which was to recgonize those who have made
contributions that help further the core project. Core is generally in a
good
position to know who those people are (or at least come to agreement with
some minimal prodding).
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
--
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
