Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Advocacy > pgAdmin vs. the...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 7 Topic 1413 of 1490
Post > Topic >>

pgAdmin vs. the competition

by gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Smith) Mar 27, 2008 at 09:17 PM

This list is kind of dead lately, it seems ripe for something to argue 
about.  I toyed with sending this directly to a pgAdmin list but neither 
of them seemed right to derail with what is essentially a discussion of 
how to address competative comparisions.

I'm now firmly in the middle of the MySQL vs. PostgreSQL flamewars at this

point, and that involves lots of suggestions for working around what 
people percieve as the PG flaws.  Recently I suggested to someone that if 
they needed a GUI management tool, pgAdmin III was what they should try. 
It's hard to get critical yet fair feedback out of people, I thought the 
rsponse I got back was quite good:

"I'm writing to give a bit of feedback.  Cut my teeth in MySQL via the 
console many years ago, moved to msSQL's semi-good GUI and then to its 
superior 2005 SQL Manager (best DB GUI admin on the market IMHO), then to 
MySQL Admin which isn't bad actually.  I'm currently at a PostgreSQL shop 
and I'm so disspointed in pgAdmin (I'm running the newest build too).

For starters it seems to lack UI elements that have been in the GUI world 
since Windows 3.11.  Whenever PostgreSQL is busy the UI fails to give any 
clue, no icon changes to a spinning hourglass, no status bar filling up, 
not even a mindless pop-up saying "busy...".  This is painfully obvious 
when doing a BACKUP or RESTORE.  And even when either task completes, the 
UI/text doesn't do much to even let me know it worked.  In fact it just 
re-enables the buttons again, where at first I'd click them and it would 
try to do the backup/restore again, which really made me believe the whole

operation failed."

I forward this along not to pick on pgAdmin, which is hampered in 
particular by being so cross-platform which Microsoft doesn't have to 
worry about, but to point out this is a not particularly obvious way 
PostgreSQL comparisions sometimes fail.  This is not even close to the 
first time I've heard comments about how large the distance is between 
pgAdmin and the SQL Manager software in particular is, just the first time

I could share the re****t.

Something to chew on for those thinking about development resource 
allocation...

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.gregsmith.com
Baltimore, MD

-- 
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
pgAdmin vs. the competition
gsmith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 21:17:24 
Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition
guillaume@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-03-28 15:49:04 
Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition
pgadmin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-28 16:38:03 
Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition
ishii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-02 12:39:11 
Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition
ishii@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 12:35:46 
Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition
xzilla@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-01 21:21:23 
Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition
xzilla@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-01 21:28:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 1:13:35 CDT 2008.