On May 7, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 08:57:39AM +0700, Mudy Situmorang wrote:
>>
>> I believe we should take the path of Oracle. The database company
>> that
>> become an Information Company, by their strength in education and
>> certification.
>
> That's not the only thing that Oracle did. There is an im****tant
> difference with Oracle: Oracle Corp can restrict what any of its
> customers say about the database system by virtue of the license those
> customers agreed to, and it can also control what any employees say
> about the system. This contrast is im****tant, because it puts
> practical limits on what an effort in the community can do.
>
> Furthermore, Oracle Corp had large amounts of money to spend on this
> certification effort. The programs you are discussing are expensive
> to operate and extremely hard to develop. This isn't something you do
> in a weekend with your friends, and still have it be valid.
The Original Poster has big plans. Very big plans. Such plans
require very large
wallets. We are not a company. We do not have the funding Oracle
has/did. Mind you, if the OP has these funds, we're willing to
accept them.
I was going to reply in more detail to the OP, but I find myself
occupied with real things in the next three weeks. Not hypotheticals
and nice-to-haves. :)
We need people willing to do heavy lifting. Not heavy thinking.
--
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/
dan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
|
