Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Bugs > Re: Inconsisten...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 6 Topic 3714 of 4088
Post > Topic >>

Re: Inconsistent ****ft operator

by tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) Apr 19, 2008 at 11:26 AM

Roman Kononov <kononov@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> The below test cases show the obvious inconsistency between different 
> integer types.

[ shrug... ]  The << and >> operators just expose the behavior of the
local C compiler's ****ft operators, and it's clearly stated in the C
spec that ****fting by more than the word width produces unspecified
results.  I don't see a bug here, any more than it's a bug that the
floating point operators expose machine-specific behavior.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Inconsistent shift operator
kononov@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-19 01:25:25 
Re: Inconsistent shift operator
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-04-19 11:26:57 
Re: Inconsistent shift operator
sam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S  2008-04-20 14:38:42 
Re: Inconsistent shift operator
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-04-20 12:27:38 
Re: Inconsistent shift operator
peter_e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-20 19:08:00 
Re: Inconsistent shift operator
sam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S  2008-04-20 19:58:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 12:14:48 CDT 2008.