Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Bugs > Re: BUG #4115: ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 4 Topic 3716 of 3967
Post > Topic >>

Re: BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO

by daniel@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Ruoso) Apr 19, 2008 at 10:52 PM

Sáb, 2008-04-19 às 12:10 -0500, Jaime Casanova escreveu:
> """
> Unlike the previous examples, "2007-04-05 14:30" is considered two
> separate, but acceptable, representations—one for date and the other
> for time. It is then left to the reader to interpret the two separate
> representations as meaning a single time point based on the context.
> """

On the other hand, some im****tant ISO8601-based specifications only
accept the dateTtime notation, for instance XML Schema.

As I was talking on #postgresql, I think it would be nice to have that
output option as one of the date/time output styles (name it ISO8601 or
ISO-strict), and it really doesn't need to be the default (the way pg
uses it now is nice for the human reader).

daniel




-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO
daniel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-19 11:38:24 
Re: BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO
systemguards@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-19 12:10:34 
Re: BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO
daniel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-19 22:52:00 
Re: BUG #4115: PostgreSQL ISO format is not really ISO
peter_e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-20 17:31:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 21 22:51:23 CDT 2008.