Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Bugs > Re: BUG #4114: ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 3715 of 4088
Post > Topic >>

Re: BUG #4114: Inconsistent ****ft operator

by sam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Mason) Apr 20, 2008 at 08:02 PM

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:17:50PM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Roman Kononov napsal(a):
> >The below test cases show the obvious inconsistency between different
> >integer types.
> 
> It seems to be OK regarding how C ****ft operator works. Try

Yes, but I interpret this behaviour as not being very useful for people
writing SQL code that uses the ****ft operators.  C is a very low level
language and you almost always end up writing platform specific code,
SQL is supposed to be much higher level and should abstract away system
specific differences.

I've not been able to think of a nice way of doing this though.


  Sam

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
BUG #4114: Inconsistent shift operator
kononov@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-19 06:36:16 
Re: BUG #4114: Inconsistent shift operator
Zdenek.Kotala@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-20 20:17:50 
Re: BUG #4114: Inconsistent shift operator
sam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S  2008-04-20 20:02:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 12:12:31 CDT 2008.