Craig Ringer wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Craig Ringer
>> <craig@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> Alas, Process Explorer doesn't seem to work on Vista. MS think that
>>> Process
>>> monitor is a replacement, but it lacks all the handy detailed process
>>> introspection, thread control, etc that Process Explorer has.
>>>
>>> Frustrating.
>>
>> Eh? Process Monitor certainly works on Vista (although I haven't used
>> it on SP1 yet). I used it extensively when trying to figure out a
>> rather nasty bug issue in our privilege-shedding code a while back.
>
> Interesting. I've always had system stability problems after launching
> either it or filemon. I'm about to configure a clean Vista install (post
> hard disk failure) so I'll have to re-test. Perhaps there was a hook DLL
> or similar nastyness interfering.
Sorry, I just re-read your mail and noticed you said process monitor,
not explorer.
I've had issues with process *Explorer* on Vista. Process monitor works
perfectly, but seems to lack some of the features of process explorer.
This could have been system configuration specific, but I've seen enough
re****ts to think it's probably not.
Anyway, this is way off topic.
--
Craig Ringer
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
|
