Hi lists,
I want to let you take part in my experience of performance boost for
delete operations
where more than one column is part of a primary key.
For my setup, in 8.1 a delete query which deletes 200000 entries depending
on rows in another table
runs about 7h, in 8.2 (and later) it runs 9s!
I have two tables looking exactly the same, with two columns in the pk,
one varchar(20) and one char(1).
Both tables contain the same contents.
Explain produces the following difference:
8.1:
tplinux=> explain delete from pluext1 where (plunmbr,pluexttype) in
(select plunmbr,pluexttype from pluext2);
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Join (cost=24267.10..155886.35 rows=48236 width=6)
Hash Cond: ("outer".pluexttype = "inner".pluexttype)
Join Filter: ("outer".plunmbr = "inner".plunmbr)
-> Seq Scan on pluext1 (cost=0.00..6945.00 rows=138900 width=46)
-> Hash (cost=24116.37..24116.37 rows=13891 width=40)
-> Unique (cost=23074.62..24116.37 rows=13891 width=40)
-> Sort (cost=23074.62..23421.87 rows=138900 width=40)
Sort Key: pluext2.plunmbr, pluext2.pluexttype
-> Seq Scan on pluext2 (cost=0.00..6945.00
rows=138900 width=40)
(9 rows)
(this delete took 7h)
8.2:
tplinux=> explain delete from pluext1 where (plunmbr,pluexttype) in
(select plunmbr,pluexttype from pluext2);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop IN Join (cost=0.00..13362.14 rows=41106 width=6)
-> Seq Scan on pluext1 (cost=0.00..6411.25 rows=128225 width=46)
-> Index Scan using pluext2_pk on pluext2 (cost=0.00..0.50 rows=3
width=40)
Index Cond: ((pluext1.plunmbr = pluext2.plunmbr) AND
(pluext2.pluexttype = pluext1.pluexttype))
(4 rows)
(this delete took 9s)
I could not find an explanation for this in the release notes for 8.2,
I thought it was much earlier that multi column indexes could be used.
Anyway, it saved my life that new version is fast. Many thanks to the
developer!
BTW I do not understand the output of the 8.2 explain:
From my understanding it should do a seq scan on pluext2 (and not
pluext1)
and an index scan on pluext1 (and not pluext2).
Regards,
Michael
--
Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Paderborn
Registergericht Paderborn HRB 3507
Geschäftsführer: Eckard Heidloff (Vorsitzender), Stefan Auerbach, Dr.
Jürgen Wunram
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Karl-Heinz Stiller
Steuernummer: 339/5884/0020 - Ust-ID Nr.: DE812927716 - WEEE-Reg.-Nr.
DE44477193
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der
richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben,
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail.
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser E-Mail ist
nicht gestattet.
This e-mail may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify
the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying,
disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly
forbidden.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
|
