Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql General > Re: postgresql'...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 5 Topic 15986 of 17437
Post > Topic >>

Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation

by tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) Jul 6, 2008 at 11:29 PM

Kent Tong <kent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> Is MVCC not well defined?

It's not defined by the SQL standard, nor any other standard that I know
of.  So yes, different implementations might mean subtly different
things by it.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
postgresql's MVCC implementation
kent@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-06 06:15:24 
Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-06 10:40:09 
Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation
kent@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-06 20:10:17 
Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-07-06 23:29:07 
Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation
kent@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-07-06 20:41:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 15:59:13 CST 2008.