Re: Protection from SQL injection

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:26:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> 1. Inexpensive to implement;
> 2. Unlikely to break most applications;
> 3. Closes off a fairly large class of injection attacks.
> 
> The cost/benefit ratio looks pretty good (unlike the idea that started
> this thread...)

That's a much more elegant way of putting what I thought.  Thanks,
Tom.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers