Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:56:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> AFAICS the only thing left that really needs to be discussed more during
> this commit-fest is the business about whether it's sane to be trying to
> apply selinux restrictions in simple_heap_update and friends.  

I don't have any opinion about the patches, obviously, but I'm
wondering whether there is, somewhere, an outline of what the _goals_
of this system are.  If we have requirements that we can measure the
implementation against, we can know whether to throw away a particular
goal as being basically incompatible with the design of Postgres
(i.e. not an "enhancement" but a "reconception") or else as being
implementable with another approach.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers