Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Data Bases > Pgsql Hackers > Re: [0/4] Propo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 23 of 27 Topic 9282 of 10966
Post > Topic >>

Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

by kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (KaiGai Kohei) May 30, 2008 at 03:08 PM

Tom Lane wrote:
> The idea of input functions that alter system tables scares me.

An example:
  SELECT 'system_u:object_r:sepgsql_table_t:SystemHigh'::security_label;

can insert a new tuple into pg_security, but it is not a desirable
behavior.

To fix this, I'll remove security_label type and define "security_context"
system column as a text type column, and translate the contents into
an internal identifical representation just before update or insert a
tuple.

It enables to avoid to insert a tem****ary used (unnecessary) security
context,
and enables to use various kind of text functions.

Please comment it, if you have anything.

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
 




 27 Posts in Topic:
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-30 18:01:57 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
josh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-30 18:01:58 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
jd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (&q  2008-04-30 19:11:34 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-05 21:58:11 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-05 16:39:25 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-06 14:56:41 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
ajs@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (A  2008-05-06 15:11:38 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-06 15:28:25 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
ajs@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (A  2008-05-06 16:00:13 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-06 17:44:44 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
josh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-05-07 11:19:56 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 18:02:15 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-07 10:06:17 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 19:10:32 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-09 10:23:12 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:18:54 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-12 10:30:13 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
andrew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 10:45:55 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-12 10:52:37 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 18:46:56 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 14:52:27 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 15:06:51 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-30 15:08:56 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
bruce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-25 23:58:09 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
josh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-06-26 07:43:39 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
kaigai@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-27 00:32:32 
Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
josh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-06-26 09:29:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 13:35:04 CST 2008.