"Tom Lane" <tgl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>> Why does a collation have a schema?
>
> Because the SQL spec says so. Also, if we don't put them in schemas,
> we have no nice way to distinguish built-in and user-defined collations,
> which creates a problem for pg_dump.
Out of curiosity, what is a "user-defined collation"? Are there SQL
statements
to go around declaring what order code points should be sorted in? That
seems
like it would be... quite tedious!
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication sup****t!
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
