Re: A Windows x64 ****t of PostgreSQL

"Ken Camann" <kjcamann@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> Oh I see.  Between this and looking again at the warning list, I see
> that it will probably take a lot more work than I thought.  There are
> about 450 occurrences of the assumption that sizeof(size_t) ==
> sizeof(int).

[ blink... ]  There are *zero* occurrences of the assumption that 
sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(int), unless maybe in some of that grotty
#ifdef WIN32 code.  Postgres has run on 64-bit platforms for many
years now.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers