Re: CommitFest rules

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> The one I advised be added (the Auto Explain patch) was posted on Mar
> 29, 2008
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg01214.php),
> re-posted the Jun 30th and then an updated patch today... It only
> being the 3rd i figured it still meet the criteria. If thats not the
> case, I apologize.

You'll note I didn't actually mention any specific patches.

The CommitFests are designed to be short and quick to complete. We
need *all* patches to be listed (not just posted to a list sometime in
the past couple of months) before it starts, otherwise organisation of
reviewers and completion of the Fest becomes chaotic for all and a
nightmare task for the CommitFest manager.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers